Full PDF of Volume 51, Issue 1/2
David Osworth & Kathleen Cunningham
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) provides guidance and expectations to state education agencies. We examined the intersection of improvement science and ESSA through a qualitative analysis of the state guidance documents. This study contributes to the growing dialogue regarding improvement science’s place in education policy.
Krista M. Bixler, Noelle Balsamo, & Jennifer A. Sughrue
The purpose of this study was to investigate how Florida’s 67 school districts planned to mitigate the anticipated learning losses among students with disabilities, to determine if the districts’ plans were sufficiently comprehensive to ensure Free Appropriate Education (FAPE), and to determine if there was evidence of leadership actions that would support students with disabilities and their service providers.
Dianne Gardner Renn, Rachel Shefner, Kelly Holmes, Stacy A. Wenzel, & Eric Osthoff
The paper highlights the development of a collaborative formative assessment scoring process in a partnership between an urban university and one of the nation’s largest districts. We explore collaborative research through the lens of a single formative assessment rubric derived from the Claims, Evidence, and Reasoning Framework (CER, McNeill & Krajcik, 2011) to guide teachers to meet the instructional demands of enhanced learning standards through a consensus scoring process.
Ethan Davis
The principal can create dynamic changes across a school and district if they are willing to partner with other educators and policy makers to build trust along a common understanding of the purposes of education. In crafting this shared definition or vision, the instructional leader would be wise to turn to the educational philosopher, John Dewey. Dimitriadis and Kamberelis (2006) state that, “For Dewey, the purpose of education is the intellectual, social, emotional, and moral development of the individual within a democratic society” (p. 9). This definition focuses on the development of the individual freed from what that individual stands to gain, and, even more importantly, what others stand to gain. It pulls away from the anthropocentric version of society specifically in capitalistic societies, and allows the individual to become the author of their own experience. As authors or creators, students can choose to use their abilities to create something new or solve societal problems.
|